{"id":46490,"date":"2025-01-23T22:40:51","date_gmt":"2025-01-23T22:40:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/?page_id=46490"},"modified":"2025-01-31T16:18:26","modified_gmt":"2025-01-31T16:18:26","slug":"parametre-for-vaabens-effektivitet-weapon-effectiveness-parameters","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/parametre-for-vaabens-effektivitet-weapon-effectiveness-parameters\/","title":{"rendered":"Parametre for v\u00e5bens effektivitet\/Weapon effectiveness parameters"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Parametre for v\u00e5bens effektivitet \/ Weapon effectiveness parameters.<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Det er n\u00e6rmest utroligt, hvor h\u00f8jt en kronhjort kan br\u00f8le.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Kronhjorten er i brunst september-oktober, og hjorten br\u00f8ler for at stimulere hinderne, som siges kun at v\u00e6re i brunst et enkelt d\u00f8gn.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Ofte ses at kronhjorten br\u00f8ler lige inden han tr\u00e6der ud i en lysning sammen med sine indsamlede hinder med deres kalve – dette for at advare eventuelle andre kronhjorte i n\u00e6rheden. – Jo flere hinder en kronhjort har samlet sig, jo st\u00e6rkere er han.<\/span><\/p>

————–<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

It’s almost unbelievable how loud a stag can roar.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

The red deer is in rut from September to October, and each stag roars to stimulate the hinds, which are said to only be in rut for a single day.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

The stag is often seen roaring just before he steps out into a clearing with his collected hinds and their calves – this is to warn any other stag nearby. – The more hinds a stag has collected, the stronger he is.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Denne 1- \u00e5rige buk kom ud af rapsmarken, og pludseligt stod han d\u00e9r som et sp\u00f8gelse. – <\/span>Den viste CNS- kugleplacering f\u00e5r dyret til at falde bevidstl\u00f8s i knaldet. – Derimod ved en hjerte- kugle eller en lunge- kugle, er der ingen garanti for, at dyret ikke spurter ind i rapsmarken efter skuddet. – Sporl\u00e6ngden kan let blive 40-80 meter i siksak gennem rapsmarken, og hvor blodsporene bliver mindre og mindre synlige.<\/span><\/p>\n

————-<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

This 1-year-old buck came out of the rapeseed field, and suddenly he stood there like a ghost. – The CNS bullet placement shown causes the animal to fall unconscious in the blast. – On the other hand, with a heart bullet or a lung bullet, there is no guarantee that the animal will not run into the rapeseed field after the shot. – The track length can easily be 40-80 meters in a zigzag through the rapeseed field, and where the bloodstains become less and less visible.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

See this in English further down this page.<\/b><\/p>

\u00a0<\/b><\/p>

Jagtlig etik har sammenh\u00e6ng med jagtens effektivitet, som har 10 m\u00e5lbare parametre\/udtryk <\/strong>\u2013 og som g\u00e6lder b\u00e5de riffeljagt og buejagt<\/strong>:<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

1.<\/strong> Flugtdistancer. \u2013 Flugtdistancen er fugleflugtafstanden fra skudsted, til hvor dyret faldt, og flugtafstanden bliver ofte blot vurderet, og ikke opm\u00e5lt n\u00f8jagtigt.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

2.<\/strong> Procentandel af dyr der falder i skuddet \u2013 i % af antal skudte dyr.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

3.<\/strong> Antal rekvireringer af schweisshundeefters\u00f8gninger – i % af antal skudte dyr.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

4.<\/strong> Procentandel der findes under schweisshundeefters\u00f8gninger – i % af antal skudte dyr.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

5.<\/strong> Sporl\u00e6ngder ved efters\u00f8gninger af dyr. – Sporl\u00e6ngden er den (oftest n\u00f8jagtigt GPS- opm\u00e5lte) distance, som sporhunden tilbagel\u00e6gger fra skudstedet til hvor dyret findes og eventuelt aflives, og d\u00e9n er ofte l\u00e6ngere end flugtdistancen som j\u00e6gere vurderer.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

– Faktisk vurderer TR257<\/a> side 16, \u201dat sporl\u00e6ngden er den parameter, der danner det bedste grundlag for en sammenlignende analyse af efters\u00f8gning af vildt skudt med riffel versus bue i forhold til at vurdere effektiviteten\u201d.<\/em><\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

6.<\/strong> Hvor vanskelige efters\u00f8gninger af p\u00e5skudte dyr er. \u2013 Dette kunne indikere, at dyr er i live n\u00e5r de findes, og derfor har v\u00e6ret mobile i flugten. Der kan v\u00e6re tale om d\u00e5rlige kugletr\u00e6f og piletr\u00e6f, eller tamponerende pile der ikke giver tydelige blodspor og lang forbl\u00f8dningstid. \u2013 For lange skudafstande spiller givetvis ogs\u00e5 ind.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

7.<\/strong> Hvor mange efters\u00f8gninger der lykkes – i % af efters\u00f8gninger.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

8.<\/strong> Anskydningsfrekvens (efters\u00f8gte dyr med konstaterede sikre tegn p\u00e5 tr\u00e6f, som ikke findes) \u2013 eller endnu bedre: friholdt fra \u00f8vrige variabler: p\u00e5skudte dyr der ikke findes \u2013 alts\u00e5: ikke fundne antal dyr i procent af antal p\u00e5skudte dyr.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

9.<\/strong> Andel af kontrolefters\u00f8gninger (rekvirerede efters\u00f8gninger uden at rekvirenten har konstateret tegn p\u00e5 tr\u00e6f \u2013 men rekvireret for en sikkerheds skyld).<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

10.<\/strong> Hvor mange dyr der findes under kontrolefters\u00f8gninger. \u2013 Hvilket fort\u00e6ller om, hvor sikkert vi j\u00e6gere bed\u00f8mmer en hjort s\u00e5ret efter skud. Et h\u00f8jt antal kan indikere h\u00f8jere anskydningsfrekvens.<\/p>

Ovenst\u00e5ende er de g\u00e6ngse og internationalt anerkendte – og de anvendte m\u00e5lbare kriterier for et skuds effektivitet.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

Derudover er der parameteren: Andel af skudte dyr der er i live, n\u00e5r de findes \u2013 af enten j\u00e6geren eller af en schweisshund. \u2013 Et ikke uv\u00e6sentligt forhold.<\/p>

Og der er parameteren: Forskellen i flugtafstand og sporl\u00e6ngder for et dyr truffet i vitale dele, i forhold til n\u00e5r dyret er truffet i ikke vitale dele.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

————————————-<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

Hvad sagde den afklarende unders\u00f8gelse TR257 om riffeljagt p\u00e5 st\u00f8rre hjorte?\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Det f\u00f8lgende er alts\u00e5 fra mine analyser og udvidede beregninger af omtalte 10 parametre, p\u00e5 basis af (TR218<\/a> og is\u00e6r TR257<\/a>) – hvor jeg har valgt kun at vise<\/strong> disse for riflens effektivitet:<\/p>

* <\/strong>De 10 parametre for riflens effektivitet ved st\u00f8rre hjortearter:<\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

1. <\/b>Gennemsnitlige flugtdistancer for st\u00f8rre hjorte der skydes med riffel: Mellem 14 meter<\/strong> for dyr der flygtede, og 24 – 34 meter<\/strong> gennemsnitligt. \u2013 Flugtdistance i gennemsnit for mine riffelskudte hjorte (prim\u00e6rt r\u00e5vildt) er 6,4 meter.<\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

2. <\/b>Andelen af st\u00f8rre hjorte der falder i riffelskuddet er mellem 37 – 48 % <\/strong>(se tidligere). \u2013 Og hvor min egen statistik er 76,3 % <\/strong>(prim\u00e6rt r\u00e5vildt) \u2013 alt i % af skudte dyr.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

3. <\/b>Rekvireringer af schweisshundeefters\u00f8gninger under jagt med riffel p\u00e5 st\u00f8rre hjorte udg\u00f8r 18,3 %<\/strong> af skudte dyr. – For d\u00e5vildt rekvireres efters\u00f8gning for 14,13 %<\/strong> af skudte.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

4. <\/b>Under schweisshundeefters\u00f8gninger genfindes for riffeljagten 9,1 % <\/strong>(7.440×100\/81.658) af alle skudte hjorte.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

5. <\/b>Gennemsnitlige sporl\u00e6ngder ved efters\u00f8gninger af hjorte skudt med riffel, er sv\u00e6rt at beskrive og vanskeligt at vurdere, uden at se de tilsvarende tal for buejagt udregnet p\u00e5 samme m\u00e5de – men disse s\u00e5 s\u00e5dan ud for riffeljagten, opgjort jf. TR257<\/a>, Tabel 6, som f\u00f8lger:<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

– Af periodens 39.153 med riffel<\/u> skudte kronvildt var antal positive efters\u00f8gninger, op til 3.000 meters sporl\u00e6ngde: 4.374 (11,2 %). Af disse blev 3.182 hjorte fundet indenfor en sporl\u00e6ngde p\u00e5 600 meter, dvs. ca. 73 %<\/strong> – og ca. 40 %<\/strong> indenfor sporl\u00e6ngde 200 meter.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

– Af periodens 40.296 med riffel<\/u> skudt d\u00e5vildt var antal positive efters\u00f8gninger, op til 3.000 meters sporl\u00e6ngde: 2.475 (6,1 %). Af disse blev 1.837 hjorte fundet indenfor en sporl\u00e6ngde p\u00e5 600 meter, dvs. ca. 74 %<\/strong> – og ca. 40 %<\/strong> indenfor sporl\u00e6ngde 200 meter.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

– Af periodens 2.209 med riffel<\/u> skudt sikavildt var antal positive efters\u00f8gninger, op til 3.000 meters sporl\u00e6ngde: 270 (12,2 %). Af disse blev 245 hjorte fundet indenfor en sporl\u00e6ngde p\u00e5 600 meter, dvs. ca. 91 %<\/strong> – og ca. 44 %<\/strong> indenfor sporl\u00e6ngde 200 meter.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

6. <\/b>Lettere efters\u00f8gninger af hjorte skudt med riffel, end hjorte skudt med bue og pil, iht. udtalelser fra flertallet af adspurgte schweisshundef\u00f8rere.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

7. <\/b>Efters\u00f8gninger der lykkes (positive efters\u00f8gninger) ved riffeljagt, er for kronhjorte ca. 51 % <\/strong>(4.630×100\/9.132) og for d\u00e5hjorte ca. 45 %<\/strong> (2.538×100\/5.694) og for sikahjorte ca. 50 %<\/strong> (272×100\/547) – i % af efters\u00f8gninger.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

8. <\/b>Anskydningsfrekvens: Betragtes anskydningsprocenten som: antal ikke fundne efters\u00f8gte dyr i % af de p\u00e5skudte 3 store hjortearter for perioden 2018-2022: S\u00e5 har riffeljagten en anskydningsprocent p\u00e5 9,7 % <\/strong>(7.933<\/u>x100\/81.658, i 15.373 efters\u00f8gninger), se TR257<\/a>, Tabel 5 og 6.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

– Denne metode friholder anskydningsprocenten for usikre vurderinger af sikre tegn p\u00e5 tr\u00e6f (s\u00e5rede dyr), da det fremg\u00e5r af TR257, at der ved kontrolefters\u00f8gninger findes forholdsvis mange hjorte ved \u00e9t af vore jagtv\u00e5ben, som man ikke havde regnet med at finde i kontrolefters\u00f8gningerne. Dvs. at vurdering af s\u00e5rede hjorte er s\u00e6rdeles usikker, hvorfor dette ikke b\u00f8r indg\u00e5 i beregning af anskydningsprocenten.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

– N\u00e6rmere forklaring af de 9,7 % ovenfor: Af Tabel 6 i TR257<\/a> fremg\u00e5r, at der for riffeljagt er 7.440 positive efters\u00f8gninger af st\u00f8rre hjorte, og i Tabel 5 ses at der er foretaget 15.373 efters\u00f8gninger – dvs. at 7.933<\/u> dyr ikke blev fundet. \u2013 Den 4- \u00e5rige periodes antal riffelskudte st\u00f8rre hjorte var 81.658 (iht. udbyttestatistik). – Se Link<\/a>, side 17.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

9. <\/b>Riffelj\u00e6gernes kontrolefters\u00f8gninger udg\u00f8r 46 % <\/strong>af alle efters\u00f8gningerne. – Se TR257<\/a> side 15.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

10.<\/b> Under riffelj\u00e6gernes kontrolefters\u00f8gninger (hvor schweisshundef\u00f8reren bliver tilkaldt, uden at rekvirenten har kunnet konstatere tegn p\u00e5 anskydning, men for en sikkerheds skyld), bliver fundet 6,2 %<\/strong> af alle riffelskudte (5.079 x100\/81.658) i den 4- \u00e5rige periode. Se TR257<\/a> side 15.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

– Hvor mange af de riffelskudte hjorte der er i live n\u00e5r de genfindes, ved jeg ikke med sikkerhed. – Iht. TR257<\/a>, side 13: m\u00e5tte 9 bueskudte hjorte ud af 26 efters\u00f8gte hjorte aflives, dvs. ca. 35 %,<\/strong> i schweisshunde- efters\u00f8gninger.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

– Hvad dette er for riffeljagten ved jeg ikke, men hos buejagten s\u00e5s en lille forskel (7,9 meter<\/strong>) i gennemsnitlig flugtafstand fra et optimalt piletr\u00e6f i vitale dele, til gennemsnitlige flugtafstand ved alle tr\u00e6f (uanset tr\u00e6fpunkt, alts\u00e5 inkl. dyr truffet i ikke vitale dele). \u2013 Dette udregnet som forskellen mellem: TR257<\/a>, side 14 ses at gennemsnitlig flugtdistance er p\u00e5 64,8 meter for piletr\u00e6f i hjerte\/lunge- regionen for kronhjort og d\u00e5hjort \u2013 og den p\u00e5 samme side anf\u00f8rte gennemsnitlige flugtdistance for kronhjort\/d\u00e5hjort p\u00e5 72,7 meter.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

Ret beset, kan det hele koges ned til 4 af de vigtigste parametre<\/strong> for effektivitet for et jagtv\u00e5ben, b\u00e5de riflen og bue og pil – som entydigt grundlag at vurdere effektivitet p\u00e5:<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

1.\u00a0<\/strong>Det mest centrale og det mest sigende m\u00e5l for effektivitet: \u201dTid fra tr\u00e6f til bevidstl\u00f8shed\u201d (mangler nu).<\/p>

2. <\/b>Anskydningsfrekvensen.\u00a0<\/p>

3. <\/b>Sporl\u00e6ngder.<\/p>

4. <\/b>Antal rekvirerede efters\u00f8gninger.<\/p>

Efter alt at d\u00f8mme, mangler det vigtigste udtryk for et v\u00e5bens effektivitet:<\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>

Data fra b\u00e5de riffelj\u00e6gere og buej\u00e6gerne mangler et udtryk for tid til bevidstl\u00f8shed\/d\u00f8d (som ikke n\u00f8dvendigvis afspejles i flugtafstanden, der er en central variabel i materialet).\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Vi mangler derfor i virkeligheden:<\/strong> \u201dTid fra tr\u00e6f til bevidstl\u00f8shed\u201d, som burde v\u00e6re overkommeligt at finde, og som l\u00e6nge har v\u00e6ret efterspurgt.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

Dette underst\u00f8ttes af det skrevne i en teknisk rapport TR257<\/a> fra Aarhus Universitet:<\/p>

Af TR257 side 22 ses: \u201dDet er intuitivt og generelt anerkendt, at tidsrummet fra et dyr tr\u00e6ffes af et skud, til det d\u00f8r, er bestemmende for den dyrev\u00e6rnsm\u00e6ssige forsvarlighed af en aflivning (drab), idet l\u00e6ngden af dette tidsrum opfattes som proportional med omfanget af den smerte og stressp\u00e5virkning, som aflivningen potentielt p\u00e5f\u00f8rer dyret. Jo t\u00e6ttere l\u00e6ngden af dette tidsrum er p\u00e5 0 (\u00f8jeblikkelig effekt), desto mere forsvarligt. Det er i mange sammenh\u00e6nge anerkendt, at tidspunktet for bevidstl\u00f8shed i denne forst\u00e5else kan st\u00e5 i stedet for d\u00f8dstidspunktet\u201d. (Smith m.fl. 2022)\u201d.<\/em><\/p>

\u00a0<\/em><\/p>

* <\/strong>S\u00e5ledes ses, at tid fra bevidsthedstab til d\u00f8d ikke har nogen central betydning \u2013 n\u00e5r det videnskabelige og intuitive taler – og at \u201dTid fra tr\u00e6f til bevidstl\u00f8shed\u201d h\u00e6nger sammen med dyrev\u00e6rnsm\u00e6ssig forsvarlighed – og at dette tidsrum h\u00f8jst t\u00e6nkeligt er proportionalt med omfang af smerte, angst og stress.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

* Al logik taler for, at jo kortere flugtafstande p\u00e5skudte dyr har, jo kortere er: “Tid fra tr\u00e6f til bevidstl\u00f8shed” og jo kortere er den mulige periode dyret kan v\u00e6re angst og lide i.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

——————————<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

In English:<\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/b><\/p>\n

Hunting ethics are related to the effectiveness of hunting, which has 10 measurable parameters\/terms<\/b> \u2013 and which apply to both rifle hunting and bow hunting<\/b>:<\/p>


<\/p>\n

1. <\/b>Flight distances. \u2013 Flight distance is the animal’s flight distance from the shooting location, to where the animal fell, and flight distance is often simply estimated, and not measured accurately.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

2. <\/b>Percentage of animals that fall in the shot \u2013 as a % of the number of animals shot.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

3.<\/b> Number of requests for schweiss- dog searches – as a % of the number of animals shot.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

4.<\/b> Percentage found during schweiss- dog searches – as a % of the number of animals shot.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

5.<\/b> Track lengths when searching for animals. – The track length is the (most often accurately measured by GPS) distance that the schweiss- dog covers from the shooting location, to where the animal is found and possibly killed, and this is often longer than the flight distance that hunters estimate.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

– In fact, TR257<\/a> page 16 assesses, “that the track length is the parameter that forms the best basis for a comparative analysis of searching for game shot with a rifle versus a bow in relation to assessing effectiveness”.<\/i><\/p>\n

 <\/i><\/p>\n

6.<\/b> How difficult searches for shot animals are. \u2013 This could indicate that animals are alive when found, and therefore have been mobile in flight. There may be poor bullet and arrow hits, or tamponade arrows that do not give clear blood traces and a long bleeding time. \u2013 Too long shooting distances certainly also play a role.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

7.<\/b> How many searches are successful – in % of searches.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

8. <\/b>Frequency of injured escaped animals (sought after animals with established sure signs of a hit, which are not found) – or even better: kept free from other variables: shot animals that are not found – i.e.: number of animals not found as a percentage of the number of shot animals.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

9. <\/b>Proportion of control searches (requested searches without the requester having established signs of a hit – but requested just in case).<\/p>


<\/p>\n

10.<\/b> How many animals are found during control searches. \u2013 Which tells us how safely we hunters judge a deer wounded after shooting. A high number may indicate a higher frequency of injured animals .<\/p>\n

The above are the common and internationally recognized – and the measurable criteria used for the effectiveness of a shot.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

In addition, there is the parameter: The proportion of shot animals that are alive when they are found – either by the hunter or by a Schweissdog. \u2013 A not insignificant ratio.<\/p>\n

And there is the parameter: The difference in flight distance and track lengths for an animal hit in vital parts, compared to when the animal is hit in non-vital parts.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

————————————-<\/p>


<\/p>\n

What did the clarifying study TR257 say about rifle hunting of larger deer?<\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/b><\/p>\n

The following is from my analyses and extended calculations of the mentioned 10 parameters, based on (TR218<\/a> and especially TR257<\/a>) – where I have chosen to only show these for the effectiveness of the rifle:<\/p>\n

* The 10 parameters for the effectiveness of the rifle for larger deer species:<\/b><\/p>


<\/b><\/p>\n

1. <\/b>Average escape distances for larger deer shot with a rifle: Between 14 meters for animals that fled, and 24 – 34 meters on average. \u2013 The average escape distance for my rifle-shot deer (primarily roe deer) is 6.4 meters.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

2. <\/b>The proportion of larger deer that fall in the rifle shot is between 37 – 48% (see earlier). \u2013 And where my own statistics are 76.3% (primarily roe deer) \u2013 all in % of shot animals.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

3. <\/b>Requests for search dogs during rifle hunting of larger deer account for 18.3% of shot animals. – For fallow deer, search is requested for 14.13% of shot animals.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

4. <\/b>During search dogs, 9.1% (7,440×100\/81,658) of all shot deer are found for rifle hunting.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

5.<\/b> Average track lengths for searches of deer shot with rifles are difficult to describe and difficult to assess, without seeing the corresponding figures for bow hunting calculated in the same way – but these looked like this for rifle hunting, calculated cf. TR257<\/a>, Table 6, as follows:<\/p>


<\/p>\n

– Of the 39,153 red deer shot with rifles in the period, the number of positive searches, up to 3,000 meters track length: 4,374 (11.2%). Of these, 3,182 deer were found within a track length of 600 meters, i.e. approx. 73% – and approx. 40% within a track length of 200 meters.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

– Of the 40,296 fallow deer shot with rifles in the period, the number of positive searches, up to 3,000 meters of track length, was 2,475 (6.1%). Of these, 1,837 fallow deer were found within a track length of 600 meters, i.e. approx. 74% – and approx. 40% within a track length of 200 meters.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

– Of the 2,209 sika deer shot with rifles in the period, the number of positive searches, up to 3,000 meters of track length, was 270 (12.2%). Of these, 245 sika deer were found within a track length of 600 meters, i.e. approx. 91% – and approx. 44% within a track length of 200 meters.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

6. <\/b>Easier searches for deer shot with a rifle than deer shot with a bow and arrow, according to the opinions of the majority of the surveyed Swiss dog handlers.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

7.<\/b> Searches that are successful (positive searches) in rifle hunting are for red deer approx. 51%<\/p>

 (4,630×100\/9,132) and for fallow deer approx. 45% (2,538×100\/5,694) and for sika deer approx. 50% (272×100\/547) – in % of searches.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

8. <\/b>Frequency of injured escaped animals: If the shooting percentage is considered as: number of animals not found in the search as % of the 3 large deer species shot for the period 2018-2022: Then rifle hunting has a shooting percentage of 9.7% (7,933×100\/81,658, in 15,373 searches), see TR257<\/a>, Tables 5 and 6.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

– This method exempts the shooting percentage from uncertain assessments of certain signs of hit (wounded animals), as it appears from TR257<\/a> that during control searches, relatively many deer are found near one of our hunting weapons, which one had not expected to find in the control searches. This means that the assessment of wounded deer is extremely uncertain, which is why this should not be included in the calculation of the frequency of injured escaped animals.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

– Further explanation of the 9.7% above: Table 6 in TR257<\/a> shows that there are 7,440 positive searches for larger deer for rifle hunting, and Table 5 shows that 15,373 searches have been carried out – i.e. that 7,933 animals were not found. \u2013 The number of larger deer shot with rifles during the 4-year period was 81,658 (according to yield statistics). – See Link<\/a>, page 17.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

9. <\/b>Rifle hunters’ control searches constitute 46% of all searches. – See TR257<\/a> page 15.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

10.<\/b> During rifle hunters’ control searches (where the schweiss dog handler is called in without the requester being able to detect signs of shooting, but just to be on the safe side), 6.2% of all rifle-shot deer (5,079 x100\/81,658) are found in the 4-year period. See TR257<\/a> page 15.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

– I do not know for sure how many of the rifle-shot deer are alive when they are found. – According to TR257<\/a>, page 13: 9 bow-shot deer out of 26 searched deer had to be killed, i.e. approx. 35%, in schweiss dog searches.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

– I don’t know what this is for rifle hunting, but in bow hunting a small difference (7.9 <\/b>meters) was seen in the average escape distance from an optimal arrow hit in vital parts, to the average escape distance for all hits (regardless of the point of impact, i.e. including animals hit in non-vital parts). \u2013 This is calculated as the difference between: TR257<\/a>, page 14, it is seen that the average escape distance is 64.8 meters for arrow hits in the heart\/lung region for red deer and fallow deer \u2013 and the average escape distance for red deer\/fallow deer stated on the same page of 72.7 meters.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

Quite bold, this can all be boiled down to 4 <\/b>of the most important parameters for effectiveness for a hunting weapon, both the rifle and the bow and arrow – as a clear basis for assessing effectiveness:<\/p>


<\/p>\n

1. <\/b>The most central and most telling measure of effectiveness: “Time from hit to unconsciousness” (now missing).<\/p>\n

2. <\/b>The frequency injured escaped animals<\/p>\n

3.<\/b> Track lengths.<\/p>\n

4. <\/b>Number of requested searches.<\/p>\n

By all accounts, the most important expression for the effectiveness of a weapon is missing:<\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/b><\/p>\n

Data from both rifle hunters and bow hunters lack an expression for time to unconsciousness\/death (which is not necessarily reflected in the escape distance, which is a central variable in the material).<\/p>\n

We therefore lack in reality: \u201cTime from hit to unconsciousness\u201d, <\/b>which should be affordable to find, and which has long been in demand.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

This is supported by what is written in a technical report TR257<\/a> from Aarhus University:<\/p>\n

From TR257<\/a> page 22 it can be seen: \u201cIt is intuitive and generally accepted that the time period from when an animal is hit by a shot until it dies is decisive for the animal welfare justification of a killing (killing), as the length of this period is perceived as proportional to the extent of the pain and stress that the killing potentially causes the animal. The closer the length of this period is to 0 (immediate effect), the more justifiable. It is recognized in many contexts that the time of unconsciousness in this understanding can stand in place of the time of death\u201d. (Smith et al. 2022)\u201d.<\/i><\/p>\n

 <\/i><\/p>\n

* Thus, it can be seen that the time from loss of consciousness to death is of no central importance \u2013 when scientifically and intuitively speaking \u2013 and that \u201cTime from impact to unconsciousness\u201d <\/b>is related to animal welfare justification \u2013 and that this period of time is most likely proportional to the extent of pain, anxiety and stress.<\/p>


<\/p>

* All logic suggests that the shorter the escape distances of shot animals, the shorter the: “Time from hit to unconsciousness” and the shorter the possible period the animal can be anxious and suffer.<\/p>


<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

G\u00e5 til top af denne side.<\/a><\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Go to top of this page<\/a><\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Parametre for v\u00e5bens effektivitet \/ Weapon effectiveness parameters. Det er n\u00e6rmest utroligt, hvor h\u00f8jt en kronhjort kan br\u00f8le.\u00a0 Kronhjorten er i brunst september-oktober, og hjorten br\u00f8ler for at stimulere hinderne, som siges kun at v\u00e6re i brunst et enkelt d\u00f8gn. \u00a0 Ofte ses at kronhjorten br\u00f8ler lige inden han tr\u00e6der ud i en lysning sammen… L\u00e6s mere Parametre for v\u00e5bens effektivitet\/Weapon effectiveness parameters<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-46490","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/46490","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46490"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/46490\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47622,"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/46490\/revisions\/47622"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}