{"id":18860,"date":"2024-11-21T16:19:52","date_gmt":"2024-11-21T16:19:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/?page_id=18860"},"modified":"2025-03-08T15:34:33","modified_gmt":"2025-03-08T15:34:33","slug":"jagt","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/jagt\/","title":{"rendered":"Jagt"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Jagt\/hunt<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

<\/p>\n

En fin morgen i t\u00e5rnet giver bl.a. tid til at t\u00e6nke over tingene, nyde naturen og tage nogle fotos – for jagt er meget, meget mere end de forholdsvis ret f\u00e5 gange hvor riffeljagten faktisk ender med et nedlagt dyr. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

A nice morning in the shooting stand gives you time to think about things, enjoy nature and take some photos – because hunting is much, much more than the relatively few times where the deer hunt actually ends with a downed animal<\/span><\/span>. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Hvis en j\u00e6gers tr\u00e6fsikkerhed p\u00e5 100 meter, er den gr\u00f8nne tr\u00e6fcirkel p\u00e5 ca. 11 cm – er j\u00e6gerens l\u00e6ngste etisk forsvarlige skuddistance i “h\u00f8jt bladtr\u00e6f” til r\u00e5vildt <\/span>max. <\/b><\/span>139 meter<\/b><\/span> – som er indenfor den sorte stiplede “vitale tr\u00e6fcirkel” p\u00e5 ca. 16 cm, hvor tr\u00e6f i langt over 2\/3 af cirkelarealet kan forventes at give flugtafstande. – Se artikel: Kan du ramme r\u00e5vildt p\u00e5 100, 200, 300 meter?<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

If a hunter’s accuracy in 100 meters, is the green hit- circle at approx. 11 cm – the hunter’s longest ethically defensible shooting distance in “high shoulder hit” for roe deer is max. 139 meters<\/b> – which is within the black dotted “vital hit- circle” of approx. 16 cm, where hits in well over 2\/3 of the circle area can be expected to give escape distances. – <\/span><\/span>See article: Can you hit roe deer at 100, 200, 300 meters?<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>


<\/span><\/p>


<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

See this in English further down this page.<\/h2>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Jagt er en uundv\u00e6rlig livsstil<\/b> for rigtigt mange mennesker, og jagt er uundv\u00e6rlig i samfundet<\/b> – b\u00e5de hvad ang\u00e5r bevarelse og\u00a0<\/span>vedligeholdelse<\/span>\u00a0af\u00a0<\/span>biotoper, samt forbedringer heraf, og ogs\u00e5 \u00f8konomisk. – Faktisk er biodiversitet afh\u00e6ngig af jagt<\/b>, for uden jagt mangler incitamenter for at bevare eller forbedre biodiversitet.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Mange vildtbestande er for nedadg\u00e5ende, og der k\u00e6mpes og debatteres for at forst\u00e5 hvorfor dette sker. – Vi har ikke, med st\u00f8rre succes<\/b>, v\u00e6ret i stand til at vende disse negative udviklinger i jagtbare vildtbestande, og det ser ud til at adaptiv bestandsforvaltning b\u00f8r finde mere anvendelse.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

I mange \u00e5r har jeg fors\u00f8gt at videreformidle en indbygning af teoretisk analyse- og regnskabsteknik og matematik i vores m\u00e5de at opfatte bestandsforvaltning p\u00e5 – og hvor simulering og b\u00e5de de g\u00e6ngse n\u00f8gletal og nye konstruerede n\u00f8gletal viser deres v\u00e6rdi og styrke – og fort\u00e6ller tydeligt hvor det gik galt.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Det forekommer mig ubegribeligt, at man <\/b>ikke har anvendt alle de teknikker man har og anvender i stor stil i analyseverdenen og indenfor regnskabsteknik – og stort set alt kan regnes ud, og simuleres. – Se en Vildtanalysemodel<\/a>, hvor man finder det bedste jagtudbytte og den bedste afskydningsfordeling p\u00e5 landsplan.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

En s\u00e5dan vildtanalyse er grundl\u00e6ggende, men formentlig f\u00f8rst 100 % effektfuld, n\u00e5r man kan fastl\u00e6gge det bedste jagtudbytte og den bedste afskydningsfordeling mellem bukke, r\u00e5er og lam p\u00e5 de enkelte jagtarealer, i landets forskellige amter, fordi der er store forskelle p\u00e5 disse. – Se Afskydningsv\u00e6rkt\u00f8jer<\/a>, som baserer sig p\u00e5 ovenn\u00e6vnte Vildtanalysemodel.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

I 2008 fors\u00f8gte jeg at advare mod kommende bestandsfald, men dette var jo sv\u00e6rt at tage alvorligt, da vi jo sk\u00f8d meget (flere og flere) r\u00e5vildt – og vi s\u00e5 r\u00e5vildt overalt. – Men hvad var det vi s\u00e5 af r\u00e5vildt dengang? Vi s\u00e5 i mange omr\u00e5der 1 buk pr. 7-9 r\u00e5er, og hvor vi mener at vide fra Kal\u00f8- unders\u00f8gelserne, at det normale forhold mellem buk og r\u00e5, i en ikke beskudt bestand, er 1:2 – 1:2\u00bd, hvilket afhang af bukkenes gennemsnitlige alder.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Det er bukkens alder der er afg\u00f8rende for hvor mange r\u00e5er han kan besl\u00e5, og alle bukkej\u00e6gerne vil helst skyde en buk med en p\u00e6n eller en stor opsats – og dette s\u00e6nker jo bukkenes gennemsnitsalder fatalt.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Faktisk har vi aldrig nogensinde haft en synlig og velunderbygget<\/b> bestandsforvaltning <\/b>af r\u00e5vildt i Danmark, men koncentreret energien mod voksende d\u00e5vildt- og kronvildtbestande. – Og et stort sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l er, hvordan man (b\u00e5de samfundet og de jagtlige organisationer) kan ignorere et fald i \u00e5rligt bestandsudtag p\u00e5 n\u00e6rved 50 % siden 2009<\/b>, og endda i perioden har sat jagtperioden op, hos en vildtart der oppeb\u00e6rer jagten i Danmark. – I Sverige indf\u00f8rte man endda ogs\u00e5 for\u00e5rsjagt p\u00e5 bukke, i en bestandssituation der lignede\/ligner kollaps.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Vi har altid haft fri jagt p\u00e5 r\u00e5vildt i Danmark – og sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5let m\u00e5 rejse sig:<\/b> om den helt frie jagt p\u00e5 nogen m\u00e5de har spillet fallit, idet det vel ikke kan forventes, og heller ikke kan spores, at frivillige indsatser er tilstr\u00e6kkelige. Selv om riffelj\u00e6gerne har udvist fin tilbageholdenhed i afskydning af r\u00e5vildt mange steder, viser den sete negative bestandsudvikling, at dette ikke er nok – og stadigv\u00e6k er vi jo underlagt den m\u00e6gtige udbud og eftersp\u00f8rgsel<\/b>.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Ovenst\u00e5ende er kun en lille del af historien om de kommende \u00e5r og \u00e5rtiers forventelige reduktioner<\/b> i Dansk jagt – som forst\u00e6rkes af, at flere og flere jagtbare fugle fredes, endda p\u00e5 ubegrundede, tvivlsomme og principbetonede baggrunde.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Der er fredet fugle som der kun skydes 500-600 af \u00e5rligt, og \u00e9n af verdens mest talrige \u00e6nder Havlitten blev ogs\u00e5 fredet, alt p\u00e5 baggrund af s\u00e6rdeles tvivlsomme fugleopt\u00e6llinger<\/b>, og ogs\u00e5 b\u00e5de forskelligartede<\/b> opt\u00e6llingsmetoder og manglende<\/b> indberetninger fra flere lande. – Ikke alle lande f\u00f8lger trop med fredninger, og hvor den samme fredede fugl stadigv\u00e6k bliver skudt i store antal, og i forkert k\u00f8nsm\u00e6ssigt forhold (Taffelanden).<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

For blot at n\u00e6vne et par af de mange usikkerhedsmomenter i de ovenfor n\u00e6vnte “tvivlsomme fugleopt\u00e6llinger”:\u00a0 I opt\u00e6llingsomr\u00e5derne vil antal af fugle p\u00e5 helt naturligvis variere st\u00e6rkt, og kan derfor ikke sammenlignes \u00e5r for \u00e5r, grundet f\u00f8lgende forhold: Fuglene samles i opholdssteder hvor deres f\u00f8de er til stede, og ogs\u00e5 f\u00f8den flytter sig. – Vintrenes forskellige h\u00e5rdheder giver store variationer i fugleantal p\u00e5 de forskellige opt\u00e6llingsomr\u00e5der. – Opt\u00e6llingsomr\u00e5der er for fuglene ikke skarpt afgr\u00e6nsede, men overlappende. – De lande som enten ikke indrapporterer, eller indrapporterer forkert, eller ikke p\u00e5 sammenlignelig m\u00e5de indrapporterer – giver usikkerhedsmomenter.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Jagtens indflydelse p\u00e5 f.eks. dyk\u00e6nder, er i mange lande begr\u00e6nset. Dette ses af en rapport fra FACE, hvor der redeg\u00f8res for unders\u00f8gelser af, i hvilket omfang j\u00e6gerne belaster fuglene:<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

I gennemsnit udg\u00f8r jagtens belastning 2,59 %<\/b> for det samlede antal af jagtbare fugle, idet dog denne % indeholder p\u00e5viselige fejl ved landenes indberetninger. – Se n\u00e6rmere p\u00e5: Netnatur.dk\/jagten kan ikke undv\u00e6res<\/a>\u00a0og Netnatur.dk\/Fugleopt\u00e6llinger og indberetninger – hvor sikre er de?<\/a><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Der fredes fugle, som ikke forinden har v\u00e6ret genstand for “s\u00e6rlig \u00e5rv\u00e5genhed”, hvilket af mange \u00e5rsager er meget uhensigtsm\u00e6ssigt og tvivlsomt – og giver fuldt berettiget usikkerhed om hvorvidt de rigtige beslutninger er truffet.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Jo flere jagtbare vildtarter der fredes, jo st\u00f8rre kan jagttrykket jo blive p\u00e5 de tilbagev\u00e6rende – hvorefter organisationer der generelt er imod jagt, opn\u00e5r k\u00e6rkomne for\u00e6ringer i deres kamp for yderligere fredninger.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

I en slags afmagt over at landbruget jo ikke m\u00e5\/kan ber\u00f8res negativt, og i biodiversitetens navn<\/b> har man etableret flere fredede omr\u00e5der – p\u00e5 trods af at unders\u00f8gelser viser, at mange af de allerede etablerede ikke virker<\/b> efter hensigten som var, at de skulle g\u00f8res mere egnede som ynglepladser. – Med hensyn til fouragerings- og rastepladser ses, at fuglene skifter omr\u00e5der, p.gr.a. at f\u00f8den flytter sig.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Samtidigt ses, at der etableres flere og flere omr\u00e5der ved vore kyster, hvor menneskelige aktiviteter, f.eks. folk der flyver i k\u00e6mpestore sk\u00e6rme, som er synlige og skr\u00e6mmende for kystfugle p\u00e5 mange kilometers afstand. – Disse aktivitetsomr\u00e5der ses endda etableret kun 200-300 meter fra fredede naturomr\u00e5der.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Ovenst\u00e5ende er jo h\u00e5rde ord, men dette kan ses underbygget i en r\u00e6kke artikler p\u00e5: Forvaltning af r\u00e5vildtbestanden<\/a><\/strong> og Jagtens n\u00f8dvendighed.<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

———————-<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Jeg har ogs\u00e5 arbejdet meget for at vise, hvor de bedste (mest humane og etiske) tr\u00e6fsteder er p\u00e5 hjortevildt – baseret alene p\u00e5 videnskabeligt, l\u00e6geligt og retsmedicinsk materiale og erfaringer fra krige og specialkorps – samt egne mange\u00e5rige (kun positive) erfaringer med CNS- kuglen, hvor 100 % af mine afgivne CNS- kugler har f\u00f8rt til fald i knald, og stort set alle i bevidstl\u00f8s tilstand (alts\u00e5 ingen flugtafstande overhovedet).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Herom m\u00e5 jeg helt generelt sige: “At er det muligt at skyde f.eks. hjorte s\u00e5 de falder bevidstl\u00f8se i knaldet – s\u00e5 b\u00f8r dette da tilstr\u00e6bes”.<\/i> – Og det er muligt at <\/b>skyde hjorte, s\u00e5 de falder bevidstl\u00f8se p\u00e5 skudstedet – og dette endda med meget st\u00f8rre sikkerhedsmargen.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Enhver j\u00e6ger str\u00e6ber efter at\u00a0<\/span>dyret d\u00f8r hurtigst muligt efter skuddet. Lovgivningsm\u00e6ssigt er vi forpligtede af bekendtg\u00f8relse af lov om jagt og vildtforvaltning \u00a7 22: “Ingen m\u00e5 jage p\u00e5 en m\u00e5de der uds\u00e6tter vildtet for un\u00f8dige lidelser” <\/i>– og noget mere klart udtrykt: “At jagtbart vildt skal tilstr\u00e6bes dr\u00e6bt hurtigst muligt og p\u00e5 den mest humane m\u00e5de, som giver dyret mindst mulig lidelse og angst.”\u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/p>

Dette kan ses i lyset af en udtalelse af en Dr. Joe R. Bumgardner, en kirurg og j\u00e6ger i USA, som citeres (i link<\/a>) for: “Den mest almindelige type chok, hovedsageligt ved jagt med bueskydning, er et h\u00e6moragisk chok. – <\/i>Dette betyder blodtab p\u00e5 akut basis, hvor akut betyder 3-4 minutter op til 30 minutter f\u00f8r dyret mister en passsende m\u00e6ngde blod for at d\u00f8.<\/i><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/p>

At ovenst\u00e5ende er sandsynligt kan ses i forhold til: at kv\u00e6g\/kalve der slagtes efter bestemte ritus, ved hurtigst mulige aflivningsmetode (under slagtning) ved oversk\u00e6ring af hele 4 centrale blod\u00e5rer, besvimer efter op til 1 minut.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Ang\u00e5ende dette med bedste tr\u00e6fsteder, se: Bedste tr\u00e6fpunkt p\u00e5 hjorte<\/a> og Skudafstande til hjorte<\/a>. – Og under menupunktet: “CNS- kuglen \/CNS- bullet”<\/a> ser du artikler der specielt omhandler dette.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

* <\/strong>Se alle mine artikler h\u00e9r p\u00e5 denne hjemmeside<\/u><\/a> – eller p\u00e5:\u00a0<\/span>https:\/\/www.netnatur.dk<\/a>.<\/p>

*<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>See Gallery Hunting<\/a>\u00a0photos.<\/span><\/p>

* <\/b>Se Videoer af dyr<\/a>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0——————————-<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

In english:<\/b><\/span><\/p>

Hunting is an indispensable way of life<\/b> for many people, and hunting is indispensable in society <\/b>– both in terms of conservation and maintenance of biotopes, as well as improvements thereof, and also economically.\u00a0– In fact, biodiversity depends on hunting<\/b><\/span><\/span>, because without hunting there are no incentives to preserve or improve biodiversity.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

Many game populations are declining, and there is struggle and debate to understand why this is happening.\u00a0<\/span><\/span>– We have not been able to<\/b> reverse these negative developments in huntable game populations (with much success), and it seems that adaptive population management should find more use.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

For many years, I have tried to convey an integration of theoretical analysis and accounting techniques and mathematics into our way of perceiving stock management – and where simulation and both the common key figures and new constructed key figures show their value and strength – and clearly tell where things went wrong.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

It seems incomprehensible<\/b> to me that we have not used all the techniques that are available and widely used in the world of analysis and within accounting techniques – and almost everything can be calculated and simulated. – See a Game Analysis Model<\/a>, where you find the best hunting yield (cull) and the best distribution of shot bucks, does and fawn nationwide.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

Such a game analysis is basic, but probably only 100% effective when you can determine the best hunting yield and the best shooting distribution between bucks, roe deer and lambs on the individual hunting areas, in the different counties of the country, because there are large differences between these. – See Cull Tools<\/a>, which are based on the above-mentioned Game Analysis Model.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

In 2008 I tried to warn against a future population decline, but this was difficult to take seriously, since we were shooting a lot (more and more) of roe deer – and we saw roe deer everywhere. – But what did we see of roe deer then? In many areas we saw 1 buck per 7-9 doe, and we believe we know from the Kal\u00f8 studies that the normal ratio between buck and doe, in an unshot population, is 1:2 – 1:2\u00bd, which depended on the average age of the bucks.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

It is the age of the buck that determines how many doe he can mate, and all buck hunters would rather shoot a buck with a nice or large antler – and this fatally lowers the average age of the bucks.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

In fact, we have never ever had <\/b>a visible, well-founded population management<\/strong> of roe deer in Denmark, but have concentrated our energy on growing fallow deer and red deer populations. – And a big question is how one (both society and the hunting organizations) can ignore a decrease in annual population removal of almost 50% since 2009<\/b>, and even during the period have expanded the hunting season, for a game species that bears hunting in Denmark. – In Sweden, they even introduced spring hunting of bucks, in a population situation that resembled\/is similar to collapse.\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

We have always had free hunting of roe deer in Denmark – and the question must arise<\/b>: whether the completely free hunting\u00a0<\/span><\/span>in any way<\/span><\/span>\u00a0has failed, since it cannot be expected,\u00a0<\/span><\/span>and are\u00a0<\/span><\/span>not traceable,<\/span><\/span>\u00a0that voluntary efforts are sufficient. Although rifle hunters have shown good restraint in shooting roe deer in many places, the negative population development shows that this is not\u00a0<\/span>sufficient<\/span><\/span>\u00a0– and we are still subject to (<\/span>slaves under)\u00a0<\/span><\/span>the mighty supply and demand<\/b>.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

The above is only a small part of the story of the expected reductions in Danish hunting in the coming years and decades <\/b>– which is reinforced by the fact, that more and more huntable birds are protected, even on unfounded, dubious and principled grounds.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

Birds have been protected of which only 500-600 are shot annually in Denmark, and one of the world’s most numerous duck (Long- tailed duck) was also protected, all on the basis of extremely dubious bird counts<\/b>, and also both different counting methods<\/b> and lack of reporting <\/b>from several countries. – Not all countries follow suit with protections, and where the same protected bird is still shot in large numbers, and in the wrong sex ratio (Common pochard).<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

Birds are being protected that have not previously been the subject of “special prior vigilance”, which is very inappropriate and questionable for many reasons – and\u00a0<\/span><\/span>creates\u00a0<\/span>fully justified uncertainty about whether the right decisions have been made.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

The more huntable game species are protected, the greater the hunting pressure can be on the remaining ones – after which organizations that are generally against hunting obtain welcome rewards in their fight for additional\u00a0<\/span><\/span>protections.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

To name just a few of the many uncertainties in above mentioned “doubtful bird counts”:\u00a0 In the counting areas, the number of birds will natyrally vary greatly, and therefore cannot be compared year by year, dur to the following factors: The birds gather in places where their food is present, and the food also moves. – The different severity of the winters gives lager variations in the number of birds in the different counting areas. – Counting areas are not sharply demarcated for the birds, but overlap. – The countries that either do not report, or report incorrectly, or do not report in a comparabel way – give uncertainties.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

The influence of hunting on, for example, diving ducks is limited in many countries. This is seen in a report from FACE, which explains studies of the extent to which hunters burden birds:<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

On average, the burden of hunting constitutes 2.59% <\/b>of the total number of huntable birds, although this % contains demonstrable errors in the countries’ reports. – See more at:\u00a0<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Netnatur.dk\/jagten kan ikke undv\u00e6res<\/a>\u00a0og\u00a0<\/span>Netnatur.dk\/Fugleopt\u00e6llinger og indberetninger – hvor sikre er de?<\/a>\u00a0(in\u00a0many languages)<\/span><\/span>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

In a kind of helplessness that agriculture must not\/cannot be negatively affected, and in the name of biodiversity, more protected areas have been established – despite the fact that studies show that many of the already established ones do not work<\/b> as intended, which was that they should be made more suitable as breeding grounds. – With regard to foraging and resting places, it is seen that the birds change areas due to the food moving.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

At the same time, it is seen, that more and more areas are being established on our coasts, where human activities, for example people flying in huge screens, are visible and frightening to coastal birds from many kilometers away. – These activity areas are even seen established only 200-300 meters from protected natural areas.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

The above are harsh words, but this can be seen substantiated in a number of articles on: Management of the roe deer population<\/a> and The necessity of hunting.<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

————————–<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

I have also worked hard to show where the best (most humane and ethical) targets are on deer – based solely on scientific, medical\u00a0<\/span><\/span>and forensic\u00a0<\/span>material\u00a0<\/span><\/span>and experiences from wars and special forces – as well as my own many years of\u00a0<\/span><\/span>(only positive)\u00a0<\/span><\/span>experience with the CNS- bullet<\/span>, where virtually 100 % of my delivered CNS bullets have led to\u00a0immediately\u00a0<\/span><\/span>falls in a state of unconsciousness,\u00a0<\/span>(i.e. no escape distances at all).<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

In general, I must say: \u201cIf it is possible to shoot animals, for example deer, so that they fall unconscious in the shot \u2013 then this should be strived for.\u201d \u2013 And it is possible<\/b> to shoot deer so\u00a0<\/span><\/span>they fall unconscious at the scene of the shooting<\/span><\/span>\u00a0– and this even with a much larger margin of safety.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

Every hunter strives for the animal to die as soon as possible after the shot. Legislatively, we are in Denmark obliged by the proclamation of the Hunting and Wildlife Management Act Section 22: “No one may hunt in a manner that exposes the game to unnecessary suffering”<\/i> – and somewhat more clearly expressed: “That huntable game must be killed as soon as possible and in the most humane way that causes the animal the least possible suffering and anxiety.”<\/i><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/p>

This can be seen in the light of a statement by a Dr. Joe R. Bumgardner, a surgeon and hunter in the USA, who is quoted (in link<\/a>): “The most common type of shock, mainly in archery hunting, is a hemorrhagic shock. – <\/i>This means blood loss on an acute basis, where acute means 3-4 minutes up to 30 minutes before the animal loses a sufficient amount of blood to die.<\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

That the above is probable (likely) can be seen in relation to:<\/span><\/span>\u00a0cattle\/calves slaughtered according to certain rites, by the fastest possible killing method (<\/span><\/span>at slaughter)\u00a0<\/span><\/span>by cutting all 4 central blood vessels, fainting after up to 1 minute.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Regarding this: best targets –\u00a0 see: Best hit area on deer<\/a> and Shooting distances for deer<\/a>.\u00a0<\/span><\/span>– And under the menu item: “CNS- bullet”<\/a> you will see articles that specifically deal with this.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

* See all my articles here on this website<\/u><\/a> – or at:\u00a0<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span>https:\/\/www.netnatur.dk<\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>– also in english.<\/span><\/p>

* <\/b>See Gallery jagtfotos<\/a>\u00a0photos.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

* <\/b>Watch Videos of animals.<\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Medaljebuk\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Hvid\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

En meget sympatisk buk i Raskarum i Sverige – 2\u00bd gange \u00f8reh\u00f8jde.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

A very sympathetic buck in Raskarum in Sweden – 2\u00bd times ear height.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Hvid r\u00e5 ved Giesegaard ved Borup.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

White doe at Giesegaard near Borup in Denmark.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

G\u00e5 til top af denne side.<\/a><\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Go to top of this page<\/a><\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jagt\/hunt En fin morgen i t\u00e5rnet giver bl.a. tid til at t\u00e6nke over tingene, nyde naturen og tage nogle fotos – for jagt er meget, meget mere end de forholdsvis ret f\u00e5 gange hvor riffeljagten faktisk ender med et nedlagt dyr.    A nice morning in the shooting stand gives you time to think about… L\u00e6s mere Jagt<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-18860","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18860","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18860"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18860\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49775,"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18860\/revisions\/49775"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/find-dit-rigtige-jagtudbytte---find-your-right-cull.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}